Every good student of zoology learns one thing regarding
animal behaviour, not to become too anthropomorphic. Anthropomorphism is the
assigning of human emotions and thoughts to animals. That cat looks sad or that
Dolphin is happy are good examples. I have spent much of my life trying to not
fall into this trap. The reasoning behind this is that animals on the whole do
not have emotions; they act on instinct and in response to specific cues determined
by the needs of survival. Another way of looking at is that animals are so
different to us that our terms for describing emotions, feelings or thoughts
are not applicable.
The problem is I had a dog, we have always been a dog family
and since ours died I still have contact with my sister’s dog. There is no
doubt that when sitting with a dog you know well that there is more going on
than just atavistic responses. Do animals ‘feel’ beyond those primitive urges?
Let’s return a moment to the term Anthropomorphism. The word
Anthropo- has its roots in classical Greek and refers to Human. Morph references
shaped. Anthropomorphic then means Human-like and this is where the thrust of
my thought comes in. Where do we place Humans henceforth, Homo sapiens, in the world?
Homo sapiens are a
highly adaptive post-simian species. It is dominant in nearly all habitats on
the globe and has a highly developed intelligence involving tool use and
complicated social interactions. Is Homo sapiens superior to all other species
on Earth. It certainly dominates them but is it more adapt at swimming than say
fish, fast enough to catch prey on the savannah like the Cheetah, probably not.
Species evolve to fill a niche, some like Homo sapiens are able to take advantage
of a wide range of niches and are highly generalist, but they are not the only
species. Brown Rats are just as widespread.
The question therefore is one of placing is Homo sapiens. Is
it above nature, above the biosphere of Earth or part of it? Many people and
theologies place Man above all else and that it’s this right of intelligence
over all other species that dictates our use of the world and how we perceive it.
This is of course factually inaccurate. Homo
sapiens is just an ape that has evolved to the point at which it can manipulate
the world around it not just at the ecosystem level but at the biome and
biosphere level.
Where does anthropomorphism come into this debate? Well if
like me you view mankind as Homo sapiens just another species on planet earth
then the idea behind anthropomorphism changes. Anthropomorphism is no longer
necessary a bad thing but a way of describing motives, actions and feelings across
the species.
Obviously our emotions and feelings relate to our cognitive
development and our brain size but we are not alone on this planet in the
development of a brain and it should be easy to consider that particularly in
the mammalian genera that analogous if not similar emotions do not occur. I m
not saying that we can say all living animals have emotions or emotional
aspects but that in the case of many species the stimuli and drivers within the
animals brain would be too radically different to understand.
There is no doubt that other apes, dolphins elephants, dogs
etc express emotions and I think that we shouldn’t even as scientists cut
ourselves of from these believing ourselves above them. Instead use them as
learning points, use them as markers to look at development and understand that
the context of a situation. Make anthropomorphism truly the scientific search
to identify where animals are human like and just as importantly where they are
not. Let’s try and find the dividing line in Earths tree of life where the use
of the brain firstly enables the development of abstract uses of emotions and
where species are acting purely on the basis of the external stimuli activating
a series of responses.
Lastly I challenge you to watch the clip not as a man or
woman on a lap top but as a member of the Homo
sapiens species and not see some kind of emotional response.
No comments:
Post a Comment