Sunday 17 March 2024

Dead Duck - Food for someone

 When you are an avid patch worker you might assume that things become stale, but the reverse is true. I have been visiting and recording wildlife on my patch since 2002 and recording them on Trail Cameras since 2016. Ecosystems are dynamic places constantly changing and all the hours I have spent down there have barely scratched the surface of animal behaviour.

Whilst out changing out my memory cards on Friday morning I came across the carcass of a bird. It was close to the bird feeding station and not far from the backwater. At first, I thought it was a crow but as I got closer, I could see it was a duck, one of the domestic hybrid Mallard that frequents the river. On closer examination, I could see that it was lying on its back. The head seemed to be missing and the breast muscles had been eaten away on either side revealing the keel.  There was very little blood suggesting that it had been dragged to this location and the remaining meat was still fresh and red, there was little smell and no decomposition. There was a general carpet of some down and feathers that looked pulled rather than plucked. I reckoned it had been killed that night or early in the morning.


Who was the culprit? I had two animals in mind straight away. The way the bird had been eaten so neatly suggested a mammal predator. Avian predators such as buzzards would hold the prey down with their talons and rip the meat free from the carcass creating jagged tears, additionally, they tend to pluck birds leaving discarded feathers with intact shafts, foxes by comparison bite through the feathers. My number one suspect was an otter. It could easily have taken a duck sleeping on the backwater or from the undergrowth and then dropped it here.

I knew that my Mostela camera wasn’t catching much footage so I relocated this camera to watch the carcass to see what appeared later. I left the camera in place until today (Sunday) and returned to collect it. The duck was gone, and I had 839 photos and videos to examine.

To my delight, my suspicion was confirmed. The first interest in the carcass was an otter arriving at 21:06 (The mostela camera was 1 hour ahead). It went directly to the carcass and began feeding. It sat comfortably pulling chunks off and gulping it down with slappy chops for initially 8 minutes before something spooked it and it dashed away. It almost immediately returned settling in to feast for a further 4 minutes before slinking off. It returned at 23:58 and spent a further 4 minutes eating. This meant that it spent in total, 16 minutes eating and seemingly enjoying its meal.


To see a full 11 minute video click here

With the otter gone a wood mouse appeared (3:25 am) and pottered about for 8 minutes.

Daytime on the 16th of March brought a woodpigeon and blackbird that seemed unfussed by the carcass. At 19:15 a fox appears and casually starts to feed. It feeds on the main carcass and around it until 19:21, at this point, it picks up the remains and drags it off. I suspect it took the remains to cache it somewhere. I doubt the carcass was picked clean and so there was still food available that it could access later. This suspicion is validified somewhat by its return 10 minutes later whereupon it continues to scavenge any and all scraps still available. It did this sporadically leaving and returning until 20:41 and then again in the early hours of the 17th.


For a full video of the fox click here

I want to go over the footage in more detail to make sure it's the same individuals and comment a little more in the eating habits of the two species. As you can see the otter tends to settle down comfortably to eat. It rips chunks from the carcass and devours them with large bites. The fox however acts more like the scavenger it is. It doesn't seem to settle as well, preferring to stand and feed. It keeps a wary eye out and varies its feeding from the caracss to remains scattered across the site.

Saturday 9 March 2024

GardePro Wildlife Cameras - Are they any good?

 

This winter’s heavy rain and inevitable flooding have proved costly to my wallet and my camera-trapping project. The once-in-a-25-year flooding took out 3 of my good trail cameras. Cameras I believed would never be touched succumbed to the deluge, the one in the mostela actually floated off and into some undergrowth.

In all my years I have been camera trapping I have always invested in Bushnell Cameras, which I have found to be the most reliable for long-term studies. They are not overly battery-hungry and have great resolution. The electronics work well, and they have few malfunctions. As a backup, I have trusted Browning, which are solid and reliable and within the same price bracket as the Bushnell’s. I have experimented with LTL Acorns, which are on the lower end of the price range but found them not worth the price. Their electronics were temperamental, and the image quality was not as good as the Bushnell’s or Browning’s.



Replacing my damaged cameras was going to prove costly and unfortunately, repair was not an option. River water damage by direct immersion is not great for circuit board survival and the repair shop I sent it to was unable to save either of the two I sent.

Eventually, I decided to go against my instincts and have a look at some of the low-end mass-market models from less well-known manufacturers. After a bit of searching on Amazon I landed on a make called GardePro and in particular the A3S model. This camera costs as little as £80. It was a gamble, surely something so cheap couldn’t match the Bushnell’s.

The A3S model takes 32-megapixel images and 1296p video, with up to 100 foot no glow Night vision and 0.1s motion detection. In comparison the Bushnell’s I normally use take 30-megapixel images and 1080P at 60 fps with 80-foot no glow night vision and 0.2s motion detection. Both operate on 8 AA batteries and take standard SDHC memory cards.


So, after 2 weeks in the field, how does this model hold up?

Not bad. I am quietly impressed so far by this brand. The boxing is simple and functional, and the instructions are on par with what is usually shipped these days. On first impression, the build quality does feel cheap, something about the feel of the plastic and its strength. The buttons are large and the feel of the interface again seems cheap however one cannot fault its performance so far.

What makes GardePro better than Bushnell is the inclusion of a playback function on the screen, this enables me to check in the field very easily the operation and placement of the camera. I would not say that the battery life is much different from the other models and the image quality is excellent, as is its detection abilities.

You can see from the footage here that the images are crisp and the videos clear.

Daytime:




Night Time:




I am very impressed by this new manufacturer, it's early days as to their long use, but GardePro has certainly got me out of a hole and allowed my project to continue with minimal financial impact. This is a brand to watch.

GardePro - Website

Buy from Amazon