For the last two elections I have challenged my local candidates to come out and state their case and this election is no different. The emails went off this week and now I am just waiting for replies. The letter I sent was:
Dear Candidate
I write to you in this lead up to the General Election to
urge you to consider the environment during your campaign. Environmental issues
often play second fiddle to wider policies especially in times of economic
uncertainty. In February I surveyed the websites of all main parties and found
an appalling lack of information on this matter.
As a prospective candidate for Member of Parliament I would
like you to answer 2 questions,
1. How will your party
improve the environment in the national and international
arena?
2. What are your specific
environmental concerns/policy for the constituency?
In answer to these questions I want you and your party’s
views, do not use it to have a bash at the other parties or what others have
done wrong. It would be nice to have a positive approach to
campaigning.
If you’re struggling for inspiration here are my top ten
ideas:
- Ensure that 80% of SSSI's are in
favourable or better condition by 2020
- Reduce bTB using scientific advice involving the
deployment of vaccines and bio security rather than culling.
- To reduce the risk of flooding invest
in the reforestation of headwaters and on unprofitable/nonviable farmland beside
rivers create wetlands and reed beds to soak up excess water.
- Ideally scrap HS2 and if not to ensure
that a wildlife corridor at least as wide is created along its
length.
- Seriously examine the reintroduction
of certain species such a Lynx and Beaver to act as ecosystem engineers in re
wilding projects.
- Designate all of the 127 marine
conservation zones that were proposed.
- Ensure biodiversity offsetting does
not just become 'greenwash'. Regulate to ensure replacements are like for like
and that they are protected from further development.
- Develop a new designation of No-build
Zones to stop urban sprawl and the conglomeration of towns and
villages.
- Untie the hands of English Nature, SNH
and CCW and Environment Agency to do their job more independently of central
government.
- Lastly and most importantly
listen to the scientific advice given by the NGO's and government bodies
consulted.
Thank you for your time and I hope your responses will help
me to decide which party to vote for.
Yours Sincerely
Feel free to use this as a template to challenge your own candidates.If like me your undecided then take a moment to consider the environmental factors. Aprils issue of the BBC Wildlife Magazine has an excellent feature on what the parties plan for British Wildlife. I have analysed this information and drawn it up into a table showing what I think this means.
Conservatives
|
Green
Party
|
Labour
|
Liberals
|
UKIP
|
|
Tackling
bovine TB
|
Culling focused with cattle movement
restriction and vaccine development.
|
Stop culling. Use vaccination, cattle
testing and cattle movement restrictions.
|
Stop culling. Use vaccination, cattle
testing and cattle movement restrictions.
|
Allow culls to continue alongside
vaccine development.
|
Doesn’t explicitly state a continuance
of culling but does call for vaccination around edge zones.
|
Controlling
Development
|
No new efforts described just reference
to the National Planning Policy Framework.
|
Opposition to developments damaging
Habitats Directive and Ramsar sites.
Against Biodiversity Offsetting
|
More control to local communities but
nothing specific on safeguarding wildlife
|
Proposition of new Nature Act to halt
biodiversity declines and impose duty on local authority.
|
Defend Green Belt and AONB and greater
prioritisation of brown field sites.
|
Neonicotinoid
ban
|
Support
|
Support
|
Support
|
Want to examine science
|
Only ban after definitive scientific
proof
|
Farming
Incentives
|
£3billion investment in
agri-environmental schemes.
|
Support subsidies to promote biodiversity and soil health
|
No definitive policy.
|
No definitive policy
|
Introduction of new Single Payment Farm
system based on ELS.
|
Marine
Protection
|
No policy statement just description of
what they have done.
|
Increase Sea Reserves to 30% and end
over fishing by 2018 and enforce a deep sea trawling ban.
|
No policy statement just complaining of
government only creating 27 MCZ’s.
|
Proposition of marine protection in the
proposed Nature Act.
|
Leave the EU to run our own fish stocks
outside of the Common Fisheries Policy.
|
Hunting
Ban
|
Free vote on repealing the Hunting Act
2004
|
Extension of the 1911 Protection of
Animals Act to include shooting and coursing.
|
No policy on improving the legislation
or expanding it but against a repealing of the act.
|
No policy.
|
No policy.
|
Reintroduction
of species
|
No policy, willing to allow Natural
England to manage it.
|
Support
|
No policy.
|
No policy.
|
Against reintroduction programmes.
|
Raptor
Persecution
|
No policy but against it.
|
Policy for every rural police force to
have a Wildlife and Animal Crimes Unit.
|
No policy.
|
No policy but highlights
current action.
|
No policy other than enforcing existing
laws.
|
Obviously the Green Party have the best policies. Surprisingly UKIP have some good ideas followed by the Liberals. The Conservatives and Labour Party seem to be level pegging, although the refusal to stop the Badger Cull and the free vote on the Hunting Act. The most exciting thing on the whole list to me is the Liberals proposal for a Nature Act. It has been awhile since we have had major nature conservation legislation and this promises to be interesting. Obviously the act needs to have a solid framework and actually have solid laws but its the most promisingics piece of politics I have heard for a long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment