I was first able to vote in a general election in 1997, it
was my first year of university and I was quite naively optimistic about exercising
my democratic vote, things can only get better, right. I remember then that my vote was for the Conservatives, mainly
because having grown up in the 80’s they were all I had ever known, and I came
from a conservative leaning household. I think most of my friends see me as a Conservative,
but my political affiliations change and are focused on the issues, the parties
I vote for in general elections are often very different to those in local
elections. As I have grown and matured, I have learned to examine the issues
and weigh the pros and cons. As such since 1997 in the various votes that have
been held, I have voted Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat, Green Party,
Plaid Cymru and Independent. I give this piece of personal background as a
prelude to the rest of the post to try and illustrate that I try to be
impartial in most matters.
In the past 5 or 6 general election campaigns I have attempted
to place the environment on the agenda for consideration. I am probably one of
the few who actually read the manifesto and weigh the pros and cons of the various
policies. This analysis has in some years been very detailed and I have looked
at tangential policies that may affect the environment but this time in a wave
of apathy I do not think I have the strength to do the same. In previous
elections I have written to the local candidates and asked them to extol their
environmental policies and publicize them in the local press.
I have been involved in green politics for many years and I
am now incredibly disillusioned. Politicians make the right sounds but rarely
follow through when elected. I understand the difficulties of running the
country and the competing time and interests but time after time the position
of climate change and nature conservation are treated with very little respect.
This apathy had led me not to bother to comment on this
election thus far which looks like the end point for Prime Minister Sunak and the
appointment of Keir Starmer. The talking points about the election seem to be
focused mainly on the economy and immigration, and then I remembered that I
still had to vote and thought I at least had to make the effort to address the
field and its runners and riders. So here we are, more of an essay than an analysis
of the main parties’ environmental policies, I have only chosen to look at the
three main parties as it is obvious that the Green Party has the best policies
and Reform has very few.
The saddest part of the manifesto trawl was that the two
main parties did not have specific sections of the environment instead drawing
the issues into the ones surrounding energy and climate change. The
Conservatives have sections on “affordable and pragmatic transition to net zero”
and “supporting our rural way of life and enhance our environment”, whilst
Labour’s “Make Britain and clean superpower” has sections including nature,
clean water and animal welfare. The Liberal Democrats have sections on climate
change and energy, and the natural environment.
On energy and climate change, Labour and the Conservatives have similar approaches, both push the development of nuclear power
with new small modular reactors, a drive to invest in carbon capture and an
expansion of renewable energies. The Conservatives wish to build new gas power
stations whilst Labour wish to stop issuing any new licences for any oil, gas
and coal exploration. The Liberals are more specific with very detailed ideas on
committing to net zero by 2045 and investing in renewables so that they make up
90% of provision by 2030.
Given the recent travesty of the pollution of our rivers all
three parties express a desire to act upon the water companies. The
Conservatives wish to increase fines on the water companies and use those fines
to pay for river restoration. Labour and the Liberals suggest new water authorities,
regulatory bodies and greater legislative powers.
Specifically on biodiversity and the wider environment the Conservatives
had very little more to add with a commitment to more tree planting and peat
land protection, cutting red tape for tree planting and the designation of an
11th National Park with improvement to the existing ones.
Labour plans to ban fracking, eradicate TB to end the badger
cull (although they do not state how), ban trail hunting and ban hunting
trophies. The Liberal Democrats go the furthest desiring to double the size of
protected areas by 2050, plant 60 million trees a year, increase funding for
the Environment Agency and Natural England (and by extension I guess CCCW and
SNH), ensure new developments result in significant net gain for biodiversity and
the protection of peatlands and temperate rainforests and a real network of
marine protection areas.
So, where does this leave us. I think it is fair to say that
on the balance of things that the effort made to combat the issues of
Biodiversity in the UK is pretty dismal, I think it accurate to say that the
environment will not be addressed in the press , husting or any TV debates. The manifestos spend
very little time on the issue at all. The Liberal Democrats have the most detailed
plan and cover a much wider range of the core environmental issues. The two big
hitters have just rolled the whole cause of conservation into climate change
and the energy crisis.
Now this may all seem very demoralizing, and a general
election is about policies wider than just the environment, global security and
the economy are very important, but I hope that every voter at least takes the
time to consider it. I would urge every reader not to take my word on matters
and that they themselves take the time to browse through the manifestos and
reach their own judgement and make their decision on the 4th July
from a position of understanding and knowledge. Who will I vote for? I leave that to the sanctity of the voting booth. I have always voted with my head, perhaps its time I listen to my heart.